Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 18, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-01197·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RICK D. FOX, Case No. 1:22-cv-01197-ADA-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE TRANS UNION, LLC, v. AS DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION EXPERIAN INFORMATION (ECF No. 41) SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. On July 18, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal of Defendant Trans Union, LLC, only. (ECF No. 41.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005) (The Ninth Circuit has “only extended the rule to allow the dismissal of all claims against one defendant, so that a defendant may be dismissed from the entire action.”). / / / / / / Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Trans Union, LLC, from this action with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee Dated: _ July 18, 2023

‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Concha v. London
62 F.3d 1493 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)