Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 3, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-01197·Unknown

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 RICK D. FOX, Case No. 1:22-cv-01197-ADA-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND STIPULATED 13 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER

14 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, (ECF Nos. 28, 31)

INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 On March 31, 2023, Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. filed a motion to 21 amend the protective order previously entered on March 3, 2023. (ECF No. 31.) The motion is 22 unopposed and shall be entered as follows: 23 AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 24 1. The parties to this action have stipulated to the terms of this Protective Order; 25 accordingly, it is ORDERED: 26 2. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(1) and (2), the parties anticipate that due to the 27 nature of Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants’ defenses, discovery will by definition include 28 proprietary and confidential business information as concerning Defendants and confidential 1 banking, income and/or tax records as concerning Plaintiff. The parties recognize the disclosure 2 of this proprietary and confidential business information poses a substantial risk to Defendants’ 3 business and financial interests. The parties anticipate discovery on the following topics, all of 4 which by definition implicate proprietary trade secrets with respect to Defendants: 1) details on 5 Defendants’ internal policies concerning, inter alia, credit reporting, investigating disputed 6 consumer information, and other policies relating to Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants’ defenses; 7 2) trade secret and business strategy information concerning Defendants’ processes like the 8 methodology Defendants use to generate credit scores, analyze data, and other processes relating 9 to Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants’ defenses; and, 3) confidential and sensitive information 10 concerning Defendants’ product offerings, sales and/or marketing strategies, and other product 11 information relating to Plaintiff’s claims and Defendant’s defenses. This information is not 12 otherwise available to the public, and the parties recognize and acknowledge that this information 13 becoming available to the public would be extremely valuable to Defendants’ competitors. The 14 parties also anticipate discovery on topics concerning Plaintiff’s background, much of which 15 shares the same confidential characteristics, including detailed credit information, Plaintiff’s 16 generalized background, Plaintiff’s income taxes, and other information concerning Plaintiff 17 relating to Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants’ defenses. The parties state that the above 18 descriptions are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all classes of information subject to this 19 Amended Stipulated Protective Order. However, this statement is made in compliance with the 20 requirements set forth in Local Rule 141.1(c)(1) and (2). 21 3. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(3), the parties agree the details in the “Terms and 22 Conditions” set forth below should be entered by court order, rather than as an agreement by and 23 between the parties, because these terms will apply only to the immediate litigation. A protective 24 order entered by the Court will outline procedures for the parties to follow to expeditiously 25 resolve confidentiality and/or privilege disputes – ideally with minimal court involvement. A 26 court order will govern potential discovery from third parties who are non-parties to the 27 immediate litigation and may not otherwise be subject to a private agreement between the parties. 28 /// 1 4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2 1 Definitions. As used in this protective order: 3 (a) “attorney” means an attorney who has appeared in this action or is an employee 4 of any name firm and actively assisting an attorney of record in the matter; 5 (b) “confidential” means a document reasonably designated as confidential under 6 this protective order; 7 (c) “Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only” means a party believes in good faith 8 that, despite the provisions of this Protective Order, there is a substantial risk 9 of identifiable harm to the producing party if particular documents it designates 10 as “Confidential” are disclosed to all other parties or non-parties to this action, 11 the producing party may designate those particular documents as 12 “Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 13 (d) “destroy” means to shred or delete information received. Nothing about the 14 term destroy shall prevent a lawyer from complying with professional and 15 ethical rules requiring preservation of a client’s file. 16 (e) “document” means information disclosed or produced in discovery, including 17 at a deposition; 18 (f) “notice” or “notify” means written notice, including email; 19 (g) “party” means a party to this action; and 20 (h) “protected document” means a document protected by a privilege or the work- 21 product doctrine. 22 2 Designating a Document or Deposition as Confidential or Confidential—Attorneys’ 23 Eyes Only. 24 (a) In making a confidentiality designation, the designating party represents that it 25 has a good-faith basis for contending that the document is “confidential,” as 26 defined by this order. 27 (b) No party shall designate any document or portion of any document as 28 confidential that he/she has not carefully reviewed; 1 (c) A party or non-party disclosing or producing a document may designate it as 2 confidential if the party or non-party reasonably contends that it contains 3 confidential or proprietary information. 4 (d) A party or non-party may designate a document as confidential by 5 conspicuously marking each page with the word “confidential.” Deposition 6 testimony may be designated as confidential: 7 (1) after the deposition, by notifying the parties and those who were present at 8 the deposition within 21 days after the deposition transcript becomes 9 available, unless otherwise agreed. 10 (e) If a witness is expected to testify as to confidential or proprietary information, 11 a party or non-party may request that the witness’s deposition be taken in the 12 presence of only those persons entitled to receive confidential documents 13 (f) If a producing party believes in good faith that, despite the provisions of this 14 Protective Order, there is a substantial risk of identifiable harm to the 15 producing party if particular documents it designates as “confidential” are 16 disclosed to all other parties or non-parties to this action, the producing party 17 may designate those particular documents as “Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes 18 Only.” 19 3 Who May Receive a Confidential Document.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)