Ford v. State
124 So. 3d 1044, 2013 WL 5941551, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17694
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14661 →
Opinion
The trial court erred in dismissing the appellant’s timely filed Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion on the basis that it lacked jurisdiction to address the claims in which the appellant sought to withdraw his plea. The state concedes error.
We therefore reverse the order dismissing the appellant’s postconviction motion and remand for the trial court to address the claims contained therein. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford v. State, 124 So. 3d 1044, 2013 WL 5941551, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17694 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
124 So. 3d 1044 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.