Ford v. State

66 So. 3d 1022, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11084, 2011 WL 2731206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 994 So. 2d 1244
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 2011·No. No. 5D10-3293·Published

Opinion

SAWAYA, J.

Gary Ford appeals the restitution order requiring him to pay $5,500 in restitution to the victim. He alleges that he did not receive proper notice of the restitution hearing and, therefore, did not attend. The record supports Ford’s claim that he did not receive proper notice. We note, parenthetically, that the State confesses error; it concedes that Ford was not properly notified of the hearing and that the [1023]*1023order should be reversed. Accordingly, the restitution order is reversed, and this case remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. State, 66 So. 3d 1022, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11084, 2011 WL 2731206 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

66 So. 3d 1022 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.