Ford v. State
135 So. 3d 330, 2013 WL 5378825, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14661 →
Opinion
Shamiekka Ford appeals her conviction for second-degree murder. The only issues raised on this direct appeal relate to the alleged ineffectiveness of her trial counsel. Because the record does not establish ineffective assistance, we affirm. Gore v. State, 784 So.2d 418, 437-38 (Fla. 2001) (“A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may be raised on direct appeal [331]*331only where the ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record”) Our affir-mance is without prejudice to Ford’s right to seek postconviction relief.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford v. State, 135 So. 3d 330, 2013 WL 5378825, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15288 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
135 So. 3d 330 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gore v. State
784 So. 2d 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)