Ford v. State
724 So. 2d 705, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 671, 1999 WL 30989
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 1999·No. No. 98-2974·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation [706]*706of appellant’s probation. We have considered the issue raised in appellant’s pro se brief/petition for writ of habeas corpus and conclude that there is no basis to find that the trial court erred when it denied appellant’s request for 215 days credit for the time spent in the restitution center. See e.g. Martin v. State, 680 So.2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford v. State, 724 So. 2d 705, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 671, 1999 WL 30989 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
724 So. 2d 705 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Banks v. State
804 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)