Ford v. State

724 So. 2d 705, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 671, 1999 WL 30989
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2974
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 724 So. 2d 705 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. State, 724 So. 2d 705, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 671, 1999 WL 30989 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation [706]*706of appellant’s probation. We have considered the issue raised in appellant’s pro se brief/petition for writ of habeas corpus and conclude that there is no basis to find that the trial court erred when it denied appellant’s request for 215 days credit for the time spent in the restitution center. See e.g. Martin v. State, 680 So.2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banks v. State
804 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 So. 2d 705, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 671, 1999 WL 30989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.