Ford v. State

695 So. 2d 933, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7243, 1997 WL 356524
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 702 So. 2d 279
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 1997·No. No. 96-01640·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Henry Ford, challenges the sentences imposed upon him for two counts of aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer, two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer, and one count of resisting an officer with violence. He correctly argues that the trial court erred in imposing a $150 public defender lien, pursuant to section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1995), without advising the defendant of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the lien. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1); Bourque v. State, 595 So.2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Therefore, [934]*934we remand for the trial court to allow the defendant thirty days from the date of the mandate to file a written objection to the amount assessed. See Bourque, 595 So.2d at 222. If an objection is filed, the trial court shall strike the assessment and shall not impose a new lien without notice and hearing. Id. We affirm the sentences in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

THREADGILL, C.J., and PATTERSON and-FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. State, 695 So. 2d 933, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7243, 1997 WL 356524 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

695 So. 2d 933 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bourque v. State
595 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)