Forbes v. State

611 So. 2d 50, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13135, 1992 WL 383039
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Forbes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10738
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1992·No. No. 92-257·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals his convictions, after jury trial, of two counts of sexual battery with a deadly weapon, two counts of kidnapping, two counts of a sexual act on a child under 16 and one count of conspiracy. We affirm his convictions on all counts except for the two counts of sexual act on a child under 16. As the state concedes, those offenses are subsumed within the greater offenses of sexual battery. Section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (1989). Therefore, the convictions on the two counts of sexual act on a child under 16 are hereby reversed and this cause is remanded for deletion of those two offenses from- the guidelines scoresheet, for recalculation of the scoresheet and resentencing accordingly-

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for resentencing.

ERVIN and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forbes v. State, 611 So. 2d 50, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13135, 1992 WL 383039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

611 So. 2d 50 (Forbes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.