Forbes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Forbes v. State

556 So. 2d 1164, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 524, 1990 WL 6478

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 1990

DocketNo. 85-2550

StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 1164 (Forbes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forbes v. State, 556 So. 2d 1164, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 524, 1990 WL 6478 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged with first degree murder and convicted of second degree murder. His only claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on third degree felony murder allegedly arising out of an aggravated assault. We hold that there is no evidence [1165]*1165of such a third degree murder and thus no error in refusing to give the instruction. Green v. State, 475 So.2d 235 (Fla.1985).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged with first degree murder and convicted of second degree murder. His only claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on third degree felony murder allegedly arising out of an aggravated assault. We hold that there is no evidence [1165]*1165of such a third degree murder and thus no error in refusing to give the instruction. Green v. State, 475 So.2d 235 (Fla.1985).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 1164, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 524, 1990 WL 6478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack