Forbes v. State

587 So. 2d 674, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10738, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2778
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1499
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 587 So. 2d 674 (Forbes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forbes v. State, 587 So. 2d 674, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10738, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Forbes was adjudicated guilty of one count of armed burglary, five counts of burglary of a dwelling and six counts of grand theft. He was sentenced as a habitual offender based upon two prior felony convictions both imposed September 23, 1985. He argues on appeal that reversal for resentencing is required by Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). We agree. Therefore, Forbes’s sentence as a habitual offender is reversed and the case is remanded for resentencing.

SMITH and MINER, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Forbes
599 So. 2d 1276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 So. 2d 674, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10738, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.