Forbes v. State
587 So. 2d 674, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10738, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2778
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 1991·No. No. 90-1499·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Arthur Forbes was adjudicated guilty of one count of armed burglary, five counts of burglary of a dwelling and six counts of grand theft. He was sentenced as a habitual offender based upon two prior felony convictions both imposed September 23, 1985. He argues on appeal that reversal for resentencing is required by Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). We agree. Therefore, Forbes’s sentence as a habitual offender is reversed and the case is remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Forbes v. State, 587 So. 2d 674, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10738, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
587 So. 2d 674 (Forbes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Forbes
599 So. 2d 1276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)