Flynn v. Love

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedAugust 27, 2020
Docket3:19-cv-00239
StatusUnknown

This text of Flynn v. Love (Flynn v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flynn v. Love, (D. Nev. 2020).

Opinion

1 |) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP MARK E. FERRARIO 2 || Nevada Bar No. 1625 JASON K. HICKS 3 || Nevada Bar No. 13149 10845 Griffith Peak Drive, Suite 600 4 Vegas, NV 89135 Telephone: 702-792-3773 5 || Facsimile: 702-792-9002 Email: ferrariom@gtlaw.com 6 hicksja@gtlaw.com 7 || VINCENT H. CHIEFFO Admitted Pro Hac Vice 8 || 1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900 Los Angeles, CA 90067 9 || Telephone: 310-586-7700 Facsimile: 310-586-7800 10 j|Email: chieffov@gtlaw.com 11 || Attorneys for Defendants 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 || MICHAEL J. FLYNN, and PHILIP Case No.: 3:19-cv-239-MMD-CLB STILLMAN, . 16 CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND 7 Plaintiffs, PROTECTIVE ORDER 18 Vv. 19 || MICHAEL E, LOVE, an individual; 20 JACQUELYNE LOVE, an individual; MICHAEL E, LOVE as TRUSTEE OF THE 94 || MICHAEL LOVE FAMILY TRUST; MELECO, INC., a Nevada corporation; and 22 || DOES 1-10 23 Defendants. 24 25 Plaintiffs Michael J. Flynn and Philip Stillman (“Plaintiffs”), appearing pro se, and 96 ||Defendants Michael Love, individually and as trustee of the Michael Love Family Trust, 97 || Jacquelyne Love, and Meleco, Inc, (collectively, “Defendants”) by and through their attorneys of 28 |lrecord, the law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP, collectively referred to as the “Parties” and each Page 1 of 15 ACTIVE 52012068v1

eee eee ne en eee en ee em ee DN ea NOI Sed Neat et Sm NEI EE Oe

1 || individually as a “Party,” agree that good cause exists to protect potentially confidential information 2 || that may be contained in documents, responses to written discovery, responses to subpoenas, and 3 || deposition testimony in this matter. 4 Because this action arises out of, and relates to, the alleged refusal to pay a share of money 5 || received by Defendants pursuant to Michael Love’s alleged fee agreement and alleged amendments 6 || thereto with Plaintiffs, the Parties may request and/or exchange information that is confidential and 7 □□ proprietary regarding the Defendants’ businesses and operations. To facilitate the production of 8 || financial records and other documents that may contain confidential! information as described below, 9 || the Parties have agreed and stipulated to the entry of this Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and 10 {| Protective Order (the “Protective Order”) for the potential protection of business records, plans and 11 \I strategies, financial records, trade secrets and other potentially proprietary information, confidential

12 || records, commercial information, and related information and communications regarding the same 3 13 || produced or otherwise disclosed by the Parties or third-parties in this action. 14 Whereas, the Parties desire to produce certain documents or other material that contain 15 || proprietary and/or confidential information and to subpoena from third-parties the same; 16 The Court, finding good cause for entry of a protective order, hereby finds and ORDERS that: 17 1. Applicability of this Protective Order: Subject to Section 2 below, this 18 || Protective Order does not, and will not, govern any trial proceedings in this action, but will otherwise 19 applicable to, and govern, the handling of documents, depositions, deposition exhibits, 20 || interrogatory responses, responses to requests for admissions, responses to requests for production, 21 || responses to subpoenas (including the Parties’ ability to designate materials sought from third-parties 22 □□ □□ Confidential), and all other discovery obtained pursuant to the applicable Federal Rules of Civil 23 || Procedure, the Local Rules of this Court, or other legal process by, from, or produced on behalf of a 24 }| Party or witness in connection with this action (this information hereinafter shall be referred to as 25 ||Discovery Material”}'. As used herein, “Producing Party” or “Disclosing Party” shall refer to the 26 || Parties and nonparties that give testimony or produce documents or other information in connection 27 || with this action. “Receiving Party” shall refer to the parties in this action that receive such 28 |} | This term shall include documents previously produced by the Parties, both formally and informally, if any. Page 2 of 15 ACTIVE 52012068v1

en ennnene enn nnn nee II NE NR NN Be Me NIE Ne Bae Ne Bows EN

1 || information. “Authorized Recipient” shall refer to any person or entity authorized by Section 11 of 2 || this Protective Order to obtain access to Confidential Information or the contents of such Discovery 3 || Material. 4 2. No Waiver. This Protective Order is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating the 5 || exchange of documents and information among the Parties without unnecessarily involving the Court 6 || in the process. Nothing in this Protective Order, nor the production of any information or document 7 |j under the terms of this Protective Order, nor any proceedings pursuant to this Protective Order, shall 8 || be deemed to be a waiver of any rights or objections to challenge the authenticity or admissibility of 9 |}any document, testimony, or other evidence at trial. Additionally, this Protective Order will not 10 || prejudice the right of any Party or nonparty to oppose production of any information on the ground 11 || of attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, trade secret information, relevance, or any other

2 12 || privilege or protection provided under the law, specifically including the right of a Party to object to g 13 third-party subpoena, move to quash, or move for a protective order. 14 3. Designation of Information: Any Producing Party may designate Discovery 5 15 || Material that is in its possession, custody, or control produced to a Receiving Party as “Confidential” 16 | under the terms of this Protective Order if the Producing Party in good faith reasonably believes that 17 || such Discovery Material contains nonpublic, confidential information as defined herein. Any Party 18 || may require that information produced by a third-party falling within this Protective Order be marked 19 || as Confidential. 20 4, Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection: Each 21 || Producing Party that designates information or items for protection under this Protective Order must 22 ||take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 23 }| standards, 24 5. Confidential Information: For purposes of this Protective Order, 25 (| “Confidential Information” means nonpublic information that constitutes, reflects, or discloses trade 26 ||secrets, know-how, or other sensitive financial, proprietary, confidential business, marketing, 27 ||regulatory, or strategic information (regarding business plans or strategies, technical data, and 28 ||nonpublic designs), the disclosure of which the Producing Party believes in good faith might Page 3 of 15 ACTIVE 62012068v1

ee ee ee Ne me el ee NE ND Ne NE ee II NN MAE Crrem Mrvemn UI Eee

1 |) reasonably result in economic, competitive, or business injury to the Producing Party (or its affiliates, 2 || personnel, or clients) if known by the public and which is not publicly known and cannot be readily 3 ||ascertained from an inspection of publicly available sources, documents, material, or devices, 4 ||“Confidential Information” may also include sensitive personal information that is not otherwise 5 || publicly available, including, but not limited to, home addresses; social security numbers;; 6 □□ employment personnel files; medical information; home telephone records/numbers; employee 7 || disciplinary records; wage statements or earnings statements of any kind; employee benefits data; tax 8 || records; and other similar personal financial information. 9 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Flynn v. Love, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flynn-v-love-nvd-2020.