First State Bank of Mangum v. Biffle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

First State Bank of Mangum v. Biffle

1916 OK 575, 157 P. 1034, 53 Okla. 711, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 452

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 23, 1916·No. 8190·Published

Opinion

HARDY, J.

Defendant in error files motion to dismiss because petition in error was not filed in this court within six months from the date of the order appealed from. Judgment was entered on the 18th day of August, 1915. Motion for new trial was overruled August 26, 1915, and case-made filed in the office of the clerk of this court on February 25, 1916, but no petition in error was filed therewith within the six months’ period fixed by the statute. Section 5240, Rev. Laws 1910; Dill v. Flesher, ante, p. 359, 156 Pac. 1191; King w. Horse Chief Eagle, 23 Okla. 532, 101 Pac. 1135.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

All the Justices concur, except THACKER, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, J.

Defendant in error files motion to dismiss because petition in error was not filed in this court within six months from the date of the order appealed from. Judgment was entered on the 18th day of August, 1915. Motion for new trial was overruled August 26, 1915, and case-made filed in the office of the clerk of this court on February 25, 1916, but no petition in error was filed therewith within the six months’ period fixed by the statute. Section 5240, Rev. Laws 1910; Dill v. Flesher, ante, p. 359, 156 Pac. 1191; King w. Horse Chief Eagle, 23 Okla. 532, 101 Pac. 1135.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.

All the Justices concur, except THACKER, J., absent.

First State Bank of Mangum v. Biffle, 1916 OK 575, 157 P. 1034, 53 Okla. 711, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 452 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

1916 OK 575 (First State Bank of Mangum v. Biffle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related