Dill v. Flesher

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Dill v. Flesher

1916 OK 437, 156 P. 1191, 53 Okla. 359, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 412

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 11, 1916

Docket7757

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 1916 OK 437 (Dill v. Flesher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dill v. Flesher, 1916 OK 437, 156 P. 1191, 53 Okla. 359, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 412 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDY, J.

This case is presented on motion to dismiss, for the reason that petition in error with transcript attached was not filed in this court within six months from the date of the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed.

Judgment was rendered in this case February 9, 1915, and' petition in error with transcript attached was filed in this court October 13,. 1915, which was more than six mqnths after the rendition of the judgment appeáled from. The time allowed by statute within which to perfect appeals to this court having expired, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain same. Malloy v. Johnson et al., 40 Okla. 454, 139 Pac. 310; Phillips v. Dillingham et al., 44 Okla. 102, 144 Pac. 363; Caswell v. Eaton, 43 Okla. 770, 144 Pac. 591.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, J.

This case is presented on motion to dismiss, for the reason that petition in error with transcript attached was not filed in this court within six months from the date of the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed.

Judgment was rendered in this case February 9, 1915, and' petition in error with transcript attached was filed in this court October 13,. 1915, which was more than six mqnths after the rendition of the judgment appeáled from. The time allowed by statute within which to perfect appeals to this court having expired, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain same. Malloy v. Johnson et al., 40 Okla. 454, 139 Pac. 310; Phillips v. Dillingham et al., 44 Okla. 102, 144 Pac. 363; Caswell v. Eaton, 43 Okla. 770, 144 Pac. 591.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK 437, 156 P. 1191, 53 Okla. 359, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dill-v-flesher-okla-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack