Dill v. Flesher

1916 OK 437, 156 P. 1191, 53 Okla. 359, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 412
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 11, 1916·No. 7757·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

HARDY, J.

This case is presented on motion to dismiss, for the reason that petition in error with transcript attached was not filed in this court within six months from the date of the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed.

Judgment was rendered in this case February 9, 1915, and' petition in error with transcript attached was filed in this court October 13,. 1915, which was more than six mqnths after the rendition of the judgment appeáled from. The time allowed by statute within which to perfect appeals to this court having expired, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain same. Malloy v. Johnson et al., 40 Okla. 454, 139 Pac. 310; Phillips v. Dillingham et al., 44 Okla. 102, 144 Pac. 363; Caswell v. Eaton, 43 Okla. 770, 144 Pac. 591.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dill v. Flesher, 1916 OK 437, 156 P. 1191, 53 Okla. 359, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 412 (Okla. 1916).

1916 OK 437 (Dill v. Flesher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells v. Shriver
1921 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Davis v. Revelle
1919 OK 92 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
Drake v. Ruble
1918 OK 721 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Williams v. Thompson
1918 OK 433 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
First State Bank of Mangum v. Biffle
1916 OK 575 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)