King v. Horse Chief Eagle

1909 OK 76, 101 P. 1135, 23 Okla. 532, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 384
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 6, 1909·No. 455·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Cuetaai.

As plaintiff in error has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal, and it appears to the court by concession of both sides and from an inspection of the record that no petition'in error has been filed in this court in this cause by plaintiff in error, as required by Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. Okla. § 4739, which, among other things, provides “that in all action hereafter instituted by petition in error in the Supreme Court the plaintiff in error shall attach to and file with the petition in error the original case-made filed in the court below or a certified transcript of the record of said court,” and as this statute is mandatory and has not been complied with, the motion is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed. Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 736, 50 Pac. 87.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Horse Chief Eagle, 1909 OK 76, 101 P. 1135, 23 Okla. 532, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 384 (Okla. 1909).

1909 OK 76 (King v. Horse Chief Eagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First State Bank of Mangum v. Biffle
1916 OK 575 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Farmers' State Bank of Granite v. City State Bank of Mangum
1914 OK 225 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)