King v. Horse Chief Eagle
This text of 1909 OK 76 (King v. Horse Chief Eagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As plaintiff in error has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal, and it appears to the court by concession of both sides and from an inspection of the record that no petition'in error has been filed in this court in this cause by plaintiff in error, as required by Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. Okla. § 4739, which, among other things, provides “that in all action hereafter instituted by petition in error in the Supreme Court the plaintiff in error shall attach to and file with the petition in error the original case-made filed in the court below or a certified transcript of the record of said court,” and as this statute is mandatory and has not been complied with, the motion is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed. Marvel v. White, 5 Okla. 736, 50 Pac. 87.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1909 OK 76, 101 P. 1135, 23 Okla. 532, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-horse-chief-eagle-okla-1909.