Home/Ninth Circuit/Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of Lodi

Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of Lodi

271 F.3d 911
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 2002
Docket99-15614
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 271 F.3d 911 (Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of Lodi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of Lodi, 271 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

271 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2001)

FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF LODI, CALIFORNIA, JACK SIEGLOCK; IN HIS CAPACITY AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF LODI; RICHARD PRIMA, JR., IN HIS CAPACITY AS ENFORCING OFFICER OF LODI ORDINANCE NO. 1650; RANDALL A. HAYS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS LODI CITY ATTORNEY; MICHAEL C. DONOVAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS LODI ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY; ADAM L. BABICH, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS LODI ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY; STEVEN H. DOTO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS LODI ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY; BRET A. STONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS LODI ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY; JOHN R. TILL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS LODI ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY; ZEVNIK, HORTON, GUIBORD AND MCGOVERN, LLP, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR CAPACITY AS LODI ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEYS; FRAN E. FORKAS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS ENFORCING OFFICER OF LODI ORDINANCE NO. 1650; DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION; UNIGARD SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF LODI, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Nos. 99-15614, 99-15802

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted April 7, 2000
Filed October 30, 2001
Corrected January 8, 2002

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE ORDER OF APRIL 17, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City Of Sausalito v. Brian O'neill
386 F.3d 1186 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
City of Sausalito v. O'Neill
386 F.3d 1186 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. Lockyer
225 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (C.D. California, 2002)
City of Sausalito v. O'NEILL
211 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (N.D. California, 2002)
Harara v. Nike, Inc.
34 F. App'x 539 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
In Re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
273 B.R. 795 (N.D. California, 2002)
Currier v. Henderson
190 F. Supp. 2d 1221 (W.D. Washington, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 F.3d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firemans-fund-insurance-company-a-california-corporation-v-city-of-lodi-ca9-2002.