Fiederlein v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
This text of 435 N.E.2d 398 (Fiederlein v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The evidence was insufficient to form the basis for a jury award of damages for conscious pain and suffering. Mere conjecture, surmise or speculation is not enough to sustain a claim for damages. There was no direct proof of the cause of the decedent’s death and, more importantly, there was no proof of conscious pain and suffering in connection with [575]*575that death. Moreover, we find the record to be insufficient to support a finding that decedent experienced increased pain while at the hospital as a proximate result of the treatment which he received.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 N.E.2d 398, 56 N.Y.2d 573, 450 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiederlein-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-ny-1982.