Ferreira-Rosario v. United States

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJune 14, 2021
Docket1:19-cv-03175
StatusUnknown

This text of Ferreira-Rosario v. United States (Ferreira-Rosario v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferreira-Rosario v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wane KX VICTOR FERREIRA-ROSARIO, Petitioner, 19 CIVIL 3175 (NRB) S2 18 CR. 173-7 (NRB) -against- JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. nee eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated June 14, 2021, Mr. Ferreira-Rosario’s petition is denied. Furthermore, as Mr. Ferreira-Rosario has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. It is hereby certified that any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in “good faith” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, case No 19. Civ. 3175 is closed. DATED: New York, New York June 14, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Cleyk af By: Dowd AD. Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ferreira-Rosario v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferreira-rosario-v-united-states-nysd-2021.