Ferguson v. State

548 So. 2d 1183, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5136, 1989 WL 107522
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 1989·No. No. 89-172·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

The appellant, Robert Ferguson, appeals his guideline departure sentence because the trial judge did not provide written reasons for departure as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Accordingly, the sentence is vacated and remanded for resen-tencing. See Wilkerson v. State, 513 So.2d 664 (Fla.1987); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), superceded on other grounds by Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987). If, upon remand, the trial court imposes a departure sentence, it must supply written reasons. Pope v. State, 542 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SHARP, J. and ORFINGER, M., J., (retired), concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. State, 548 So. 2d 1183, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2231, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5136, 1989 WL 107522 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

548 So. 2d 1183 (Ferguson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. State
566 So. 2d 255 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)