Ferguson v. State
545 So. 2d 505, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1572, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3705, 1989 WL 72739
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 1989·No. No. 88-1754·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals his written sentence, which varies from that pronounced in open court. We remand for the purpose of correcting the written sentence to conform to the oral sentence, because the oral pronouncement controls. Timmons v. State, 453 So.2d 143, 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferguson v. State, 545 So. 2d 505, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1572, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3705, 1989 WL 72739 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
545 So. 2d 505 (Ferguson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
599 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Collins v. State
546 So. 2d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)