Ferguson v. State

566 So. 2d 255, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 450, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1105, 1990 WL 130214
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 6, 1990
DocketNo. 74908
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 566 So. 2d 255 (Ferguson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. State, 566 So. 2d 255, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 450, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1105, 1990 WL 130214 (Fla. 1990).

Opinion

BARKETT, Judge.

We have for review Ferguson v. State, 548 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), which is in express and direct conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Crigler v. State, 526 So.2d 176 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

The issue here was resolved adversely to the state in Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). For the reasons stated in Pope, we quash the decision of the district court and remand with directions to impose a guidelines sentence.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
571 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
McPherson v. State
566 So. 2d 255 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 So. 2d 255, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 450, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1105, 1990 WL 130214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-state-fla-1990.