Ferguson v. State

566 So. 2d 255, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 450, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1105, 1990 WL 130214
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 6, 1990·No. No. 74908·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BARKETT, Judge.

We have for review Ferguson v. State, 548 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), which is in express and direct conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Crigler v. State, 526 So.2d 176 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

The issue here was resolved adversely to the state in Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). For the reasons stated in Pope, we quash the decision of the district court and remand with directions to impose a guidelines sentence.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. State, 566 So. 2d 255, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 450, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1105, 1990 WL 130214 (Fla. 1990).

566 So. 2d 255 (Ferguson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
571 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
McPherson v. State
566 So. 2d 255 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)