Feijoo Tomala v. United States

504 U.S. 932, 112 S. Ct. 1997, 118 L. Ed. 2d 593, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 249, 1992 U.S. LEXIS 3115, 60 U.S.L.W. 3778, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4311, 92 Daily Journal DAR 6650
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 18, 1992·No. 91-7051·Published·Cited by 30 cases

Opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feijoo Tomala v. United States, 504 U.S. 932, 112 S. Ct. 1997, 118 L. Ed. 2d 593, 6 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 249, 1992 U.S. LEXIS 3115, 60 U.S.L.W. 3778, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4311, 92 Daily Journal DAR 6650 (1992).

504 U.S. 932 (Feijoo Tomala v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wharf, Inc. v. District of Columbia
133 F. Supp. 3d 29 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Kamaole Pointe Development LP v. County of Maui
573 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (D. Hawaii, 2008)
Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC
581 S.E.2d 415 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2003)
Napa Valley Publishing Co. v. City of Calistoga
225 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (N.D. California, 2002)
Beck v. City of Durham
129 F. Supp. 2d 844 (M.D. North Carolina, 2000)
Young v. Annarino
123 F. Supp. 2d 915 (W.D. North Carolina, 2000)
Simmons v. Justice
87 F. Supp. 2d 524 (W.D. North Carolina, 2000)
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United States
46 Fed. Cl. 29 (Federal Claims, 2000)
Duke Street Ltd. P'ship v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS CALVERT CTY.
684 A.2d 40 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1996)
Santa Fe Springs Realty Corp. v. City of Westminster
906 F. Supp. 1341 (C.D. California, 1995)
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale
902 P.2d 1347 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem
457 S.E.2d 874 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1995)
Capital Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Raleigh
446 S.E.2d 289 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1994)
Adamson Companies v. City of Malibu
854 F. Supp. 1476 (C.D. California, 1994)
United States v. Rosales
19 F.3d 763 (First Circuit, 1994)