Fechter v. Shiroky

44 F.3d 835, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1677, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4247
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fechter v. Shiroky. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 F.3d 175
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 6, 1995·No. 94-16047·Published

Opinion

44 F.3d 835

Victoria FECHTER; Thor Fechter; Tordis Fechter; Harry R.
Fechter, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jana SHIROKY, Defendant,
and
Diane S. Goebel; Bonnie Supin; Marcie Cherek; Dawn Hardy;
State of Nevada; Dan Bixler; Fred Fisher; David
Dunn; Cheryl Levin; Laurel Swetnam;
Jerry Carlin, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-16047.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 6, 1995.

Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On the court's own motion, the mandate is recalled. In addition, the court withdraws both the per curiam opinion and memorandum disposition, filed concurrently on January 13, 1995, and vacates the submission. This case will be recalendared as soon as practicable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fechter v. Shiroky, 44 F.3d 835, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1677, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4247 (9th Cir. 1995).

44 F.3d 835 (Fechter v. Shiroky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.