Fechter v. Shiroky

Ninth Circuit

Fechter v. Shiroky

44 F.3d 834, 95 Daily Journal DAR 632, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 351, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 543, 1995 WL 11152

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 13, 1995

Docket94-16047

StatusPublished

This text of 44 F.3d 834 (Fechter v. Shiroky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fechter v. Shiroky, 44 F.3d 834, 95 Daily Journal DAR 632, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 351, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 543, 1995 WL 11152 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

44 F.3d 834w

Victoria FECHTER; Thor Fechter; Tordis Fechter; Harry R.
Fechter, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jana SHIROKY, Defendant,
and
Diane S. Goebel; Bonnie Supin; Marcie Cherek; Dawn Hardy;
State of Nevada; Dan Bixler; Fred Fisher;
David Dunn; Cheryl Levin; Laurel
Swetnam; Jerry Carlin, et
al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-16047.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 1994.^*

Decided Jan. 13, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI