Home/Ninth Circuit/Fechter v. Shiroky

Fechter v. Shiroky

44 F.3d 834, 95 Daily Journal DAR 632, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 351, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 543, 1995 WL 11152
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fechter v. Shiroky. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 F.3d 175 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 13, 1995·No. 94-16047·Published

Opinion

44 F.3d 834w

Victoria FECHTER; Thor Fechter; Tordis Fechter; Harry R.
Fechter, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jana SHIROKY, Defendant,
and
Diane S. Goebel; Bonnie Supin; Marcie Cherek; Dawn Hardy;
State of Nevada; Dan Bixler; Fred Fisher;
David Dunn; Cheryl Levin; Laurel
Swetnam; Jerry Carlin, et
al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-16047.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 1994.*

Decided Jan. 13, 1995.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fechter v. Shiroky, 44 F.3d 834, 95 Daily Journal DAR 632, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 351, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 543, 1995 WL 11152 (9th Cir. 1995).

44 F.3d 834 (Fechter v. Shiroky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.