Farragher v. City of New York
This text of 227 N.E.2d 311 (Farragher v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by respondent Nazwin Associates, Inc., granted and appeal dismissed upon the ground that the appeal has not been timely taken. Where the order of the Appellate Division is final, the appeal lies only from that paper and not from the judgment subsequently entered thereon (CPLR 5611; Storch v. Moritsky, 17 N Y 2d 917), and the last sentence of CPLR 5512 (subd. [a]) is not intended to save a late appeal.
Motion by plaintiffs denied on the basis of O’Brien v. City of New York (6 A D 2d 63) with leave to renew upon the oral argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 N.E.2d 311, 19 N.Y.2d 831, 280 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farragher-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1967.