J. & L. Weissman Co. v. Goldin

459 N.E.2d 1289, 61 N.Y.2d 641, 471 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3637
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[642] Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5611; Farragher v City of New York, 19 NY2d 831), with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. & L. Weissman Co. v. Goldin, 459 N.E.2d 1289, 61 N.Y.2d 641, 471 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3637 (N.Y. 1983).

459 N.E.2d 1289 (J. & L. Weissman Co. v. Goldin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dadson Plumbing Corp. v. Goldin
104 A.D.2d 346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)