Copeland v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

509 N.E.2d 351, 69 N.Y.2d 944, 516 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16467
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (see, CPLR 5611; Farragher v City of New York, 19 NY2d 831), with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. [See, 124 AD2d 998.]

Judges Simons and Hancock, Jr., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Copeland v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 509 N.E.2d 351, 69 N.Y.2d 944, 516 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16467 (N.Y. 1987).

509 N.E.2d 351 (Copeland v. Weyerhaeuser Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez v. Rutherford Corp.
881 F. Supp. 829 (E.D. New York, 1995)
Paretti v. Cavalier Label Co., Inc.
702 F. Supp. 81 (S.D. New York, 1988)