Farms v. Farm Credit Services of St. Paul

928 F.2d 274
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 18, 1991·No. No. 90-5485·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, a large group of individual and corporate farmers, appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their suit to force appellees to comply with the Agriculture Credit Act of 1987, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2001 to 2279aa-14 (1988).

In Zajac v. Federal Land Bank, 909 F.2d 1181, 1182-83 (8th Cir.1990) (en banc), this court held the Act does not create a private cause of action. We now reject the appellants’ argument that Zajac is limited to section 2202a of the Act. We see no reason to treat individual sections of the Act differently. Because the appellants’ federal claims were dismissed, the district court also properly dismissed the pendent state-law claims.

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farms v. Farm Credit Services of St. Paul, 928 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1991).

928 F.2d 274 (Farms v. Farm Credit Services of St. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Production Credit Ass'n v. Farm Credit Bank
781 F. Supp. 595 (D. Minnesota, 1991)
Euerle Farms v. Farm Credit Services Of St. Paul
928 F.2d 274 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)