Farmer v. State

581 So. 2d 249, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6431, 1991 WL 109699
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farmer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 617 So. 2d 447
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1991·No. No. 90-2332·Published

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

Farmer appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for three counts of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon and attempted battery on a law enforcement officer. We find no reversible error in the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the defense of involuntary intoxication. We do find, however, that since the three convictions for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon stem from a single incident, appellant can only be adjudicated as to one count. See Vance v. State, 472 So.2d 734 (Fla.1985); Solomon v. State, 442 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

We, therefore, reverse and remand with directions to set aside two of the appellant’s convictions for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon.

WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmer v. State, 581 So. 2d 249, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6431, 1991 WL 109699 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

581 So. 2d 249 (Farmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Solomon v. State
442 So. 2d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Vance v. State
472 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)