Farmer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Farmer v. State

535 So. 2d 358, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 152, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5778, 1988 WL 139087

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 1988

DocketNo. 87-115

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 535 So. 2d 358 (Farmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmer v. State, 535 So. 2d 358, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 152, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5778, 1988 WL 139087 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Farmer appeals a judgment and sentences, including the assessment of attorney’s fees and costs, which adjudicated him guilty of grand theft and resisting an officer. We affirm the judgment and sentences but strike the assessment of fees and costs.

Although Farmer raises six points on appeal, we find only one has merit. Farmer received no notice or hearing prior to the imposition of attorney’s fees and costs. These fees and costs are struck without prejudice for the state to seek reassessment in accordance with Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

The judgment and sentences are affirmed; the fees and costs are struck. Remanded with directions to the trial court.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI