Farmer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Farmer v. State

581 So. 2d 249, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6431, 1991 WL 109699

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2332

StatusPublished

This text of 581 So. 2d 249 (Farmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmer v. State, 581 So. 2d 249, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6431, 1991 WL 109699 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

Farmer appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for three counts of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon and attempted battery on a law enforcement officer. We find no reversible error in the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the defense of involuntary intoxication. We do find, however, that since the three convictions for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon stem from a single incident, appellant can only be adjudicated as to one count. See Vance v. State, 472 So.2d 734 (Fla.1985); Solomon v. State, 442 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

We, therefore, reverse and remand with directions to set aside two of the appellant’s convictions for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon.

WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, Judge.

Farmer appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for three counts of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon and attempted battery on a law enforcement officer. We find no reversible error in the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the defense of involuntary intoxication. We do find, however, that since the three convictions for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon stem from a single incident, appellant can only be adjudicated as to one count. See Vance v. State, 472 So.2d 734 (Fla.1985); Solomon v. State, 442 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

We, therefore, reverse and remand with directions to set aside two of the appellant’s convictions for improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon.

WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

581 So. 2d 249, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6431, 1991 WL 109699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack