Faris v. Lampson

California Supreme Court

Faris v. Lampson

14 P. 674, 73 Cal. 190, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 627

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 16, 1887

DocketNo. 11892

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 P. 674 (Faris v. Lampson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faris v. Lampson, 14 P. 674, 73 Cal. 190, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 627 (Cal. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Foote, C.

— In this case no oral argument was had, nor did the appellants file any points or authorities; and having thus omitted to point out the errors of which they complain, the judgment should be affirmed without an examination of the record. (Mokelumne H. C. M. Co. v. Woodbury, 10 Cal. 188; Edmondson v. Alameda Co., 24 Cal. 350; Holm v. Roach, 25 Cal. 37; Hickinbotham v. Monroe, 28 Cal. 489; Brewster v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 222; Estate of Montgomery, 59 Cal. 583.)

Belcher, C. C., and Hayne, C., concurred.

The Court.

— For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI