Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. Woodbury

10 Cal. 187, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 208
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 Cal. 187 (Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. Woodbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. Woodbury, 10 Cal. 187, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 208 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.

This is an appeal from an order of the Court helow, dissolving an injunction. The record contains a mass of affidavits, and other matter, making a transcript of near one hundred pages. There is no brief, and no abstract of facts on file, and it is only-alleged, in general terms, that the Court erred in dissolving the injunction. We can not look through this large record for errors, when none have been stated by counsel.

The order of the District Court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morton Realty Co. v. Big Bend Irrigation & M. Co.
218 P. 433 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cal. 187, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mokelumne-hill-canal-mining-co-v-woodbury-cal-1858.