Brewster v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Brewster v. Johnson

51 Cal. 222

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1876

DocketNo. 4835

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 222 (Brewster v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brewster v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 222 (Cal. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

There was no oral argument of the cause, nor has either party filed points and authorities. We decline to perform the duty of counsel by examining the record to ascertain if possibly error may not have intervened in the court below.

If an appellant omits to point out the errors of which he complains, the judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

There was no oral argument of the cause, nor has either party filed points and authorities. We decline to perform the duty of counsel by examining the record to ascertain if possibly error may not have intervened in the court below.

If an appellant omits to point out the errors of which he complains, the judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five per cent, damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Cal. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewster-v-johnson-cal-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack