Brewster v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Brewster v. Johnson

51 Cal. 222

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1876·No. No. 4835·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

There was no oral argument of the cause, nor has either party filed points and authorities. We decline to perform the duty of counsel by examining the record to ascertain if possibly error may not have intervened in the court below.

If an appellant omits to point out the errors of which he complains, the judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

There was no oral argument of the cause, nor has either party filed points and authorities. We decline to perform the duty of counsel by examining the record to ascertain if possibly error may not have intervened in the court below.

If an appellant omits to point out the errors of which he complains, the judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five per cent, damages.

Brewster v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 222 (Cal. 1876).

Pincite

51 Cal. 222 (Brewster v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related