Ex Parte Parish

598 S.W.2d 872, 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1213
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 21, 1980
Docket63809
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 598 S.W.2d 872 (Ex Parte Parish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Parish, 598 S.W.2d 872, 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1213 (Tex. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the 180th District Court of Harris County in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the court continued bail at $100,000.

Appellant was indicted on December 11, 1979, for solicitation of capital murder. The circumstances of the offense are not shown by the record.

Appellant’s wife testified that she and Parish have been married seven years and have lived in the same house, upon which they make mortgage payments, for six years. Appellant’s parents have lived in Trinity for many years; his mother-in-law lives in Houston. Parish and his wife have one child, a five-year-old son in school in Houston.

Appellant, if admitted to bail, would take home approximately $500 per month as a wrecker driver. The Parishes have no savings account and less than $500 in their checking accounts. Mrs. Parish testified that appellant could make bail if it were set at $5,000.

*873 Parish received probation in 1975 upon a conviction for misdemeanor theft, but no other criminal record has been alleged by the State.

Taking into consideration the serious nature of the offense alleged — a first degree felony carrying a possible prison term of from 5-99 years, or life, the lack of evidence about the circumstances under which it was alleged to have been committed, appellant’s strong and longstanding ties to the community, his limited ability to make bail, and the dual admonition of Article 17.15, V.A.C.C.P., that bail should be sufficiently high to give reasonable assurance that the undertaking will be complied with, but that it not be used so as to become an instrument of oppression, we find that $100,000 is an excessive amount of bail in the instant case and order that it be reduced to $20,000.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peyton, Ex Parte Jeffrey
Texas Supreme Court, 2016
Ex Parte Patrick Muller
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
Ex Parte: Ty Jordan Evans
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
Adam Brandon Crews v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009
Ex Parte Andy Jonas Bell
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009
Jamaal Akil Long v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007
Amit Suryakant Mehta v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
Ex Parte Danny Ray Digman
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004
Ex Parte Gary Norman Cooper v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
Phanthakam Sirita v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003
Ex Parte Beard
92 S.W.3d 566 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Ex Parte Michael Carter
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002
Ex Parte Celeste Marie Beard
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002
Ex Parte Rouba Rabadi
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002
Ex Parte Sabur-Smith
73 S.W.3d 436 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Ex Parte Gabriel Leonides
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002
Ex Parte Donald Chachere
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002
Ex Parte Larry McDonald
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001
Ex Parte Ruben Ramirez
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999
O'NEILL v. State
635 S.W.2d 166 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
598 S.W.2d 872, 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-parish-texcrimapp-1980.