Ex Parte Jones

111 S.W.2d 267, 133 Tex. Crim. 402, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 613
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 13, 1937
DocketNo. 19369.
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 111 S.W.2d 267 (Ex Parte Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Jones, 111 S.W.2d 267, 133 Tex. Crim. 402, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 613 (Tex. 1937).

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge. —

Appellant sought release from the custody of the sheriff of Hopkins County through habeas corpus *403 proceedings, and was remanded to custody. Hence this attempted appeal.

It appears from the transcript that the proceedings were had in vacation. The transcript is bare of any certificate of the district judge. Art. 857, C. C. P., provides, in substance, that in an appeal from an order of the judge made in a habeas corpus proceeding had in vacation the transcript must be certified by the trial judge. This requirement has been held mandatory. Ex parte Shaffer, 92 S. W. (2d) 250, and authorities cited. The failure to comply with the statute necessitates a dismissal of the appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed for the further reason that no notice of appeal is shown in the record.

Appellant has filed a motion in which he requests that he be permitted to withdraw the transcript in order that he may have it certified by the trial judge in accordance with the requirements of Art. 857, supra. The motion is granted and the clerk of this court is directed to return the transcript on file here to the clerk of the district court of Hopkins County.

Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date in which to have the record corrected and the appeal properly perfected.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wagoner v. Wagoner
76 S.W.3d 288 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)
Hutcherson v. Hutcherson
909 S.W.2d 403 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1995)
Kahn v. Kahn
839 S.W.2d 327 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)
Mount v. State
317 S.W.2d 212 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1958)
Stone v. State
227 S.W.2d 227 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Sims v. State
207 S.W.2d 887 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Smith v. State
183 S.W.2d 175 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Citizens State Bank of Frost v. Miller
115 S.W.2d 1183 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.W.2d 267, 133 Tex. Crim. 402, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-jones-texcrimapp-1937.