Ex Parte Shaffer

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte Shaffer

92 S.W.2d 250, 130 Tex. Crim. 81, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 12, 1936

DocketNo. 18296.

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 92 S.W.2d 250 (Ex Parte Shaffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Shaffer, 92 S.W.2d 250, 130 Tex. Crim. 81, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinions

This is an appeal from an order of the district judge of Delta County made in vacation, in which the application of relator for discharge or relief by way of habeas corpus was denied. The order denying the relief sought by relator shows that the proceedings were had during vacation. The transcript is certified by the clerk and not the *Page 82 judge as required by Art. 857, C. C. P., which provides that in an appeal from an order of the judge made in a habeas corpus proceeding had in vacation the transcript must be certified by the trial judge. This requirement has been held mandatory in the case of Ex Parte Young, 87 Tex.Crim. Rep. (219 S.W. 1102). See, also, Ex Parte McKinney, 63 S.W.2d 697. Because of the condition of the record in this case, this court has no choice other than to order a dismissal of the appeal for want of a sufficient transcript. The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON RELATOR'S MOTION TO PERFECT TRANSCRIPT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from an order of the district judge of Delta County made in vacation, in which the application of relator for discharge or relief by way of habeas corpus was denied. The order denying the relief sought by relator shows that the proceedings were had during vacation. The transcript is certified by the clerk and not the *Page 82 judge as required by Art. 857, C. C. P., which provides that in an appeal from an order of the judge made in a habeas corpus proceeding had in vacation the transcript must be certified by the trial judge. This requirement has been held mandatory in the case of Ex Parte Young, 87 Tex.Crim. Rep. (219 S.W. 1102). See, also, Ex Parte McKinney, 63 S.W.2d 697. Because of the condition of the record in this case, this court has no choice other than to order a dismissal of the appeal for want of a sufficient transcript. The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON RELATOR'S MOTION TO PERFECT TRANSCRIPT.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.W.2d 250, 130 Tex. Crim. 81, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-shaffer-texcrimapp-1936.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack