Ex Parte Shaffer

92 S.W.2d 250, 130 Tex. Crim. 81, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 12, 1936·No. No. 18296.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

This is an appeal from an order of the district judge of Delta County made in vacation, in which the application of relator for discharge or relief by way of habeas corpus was denied. The order denying the relief sought by relator shows that the proceedings were had during vacation. The transcript is certified by the clerk and not the *Page 82 judge as required by Art. 857, C. C. P., which provides that in an appeal from an order of the judge made in a habeas corpus proceeding had in vacation the transcript must be certified by the trial judge. This requirement has been held mandatory in the case of Ex Parte Young, 87 Tex.Crim. Rep. (219 S.W. 1102). See, also, Ex Parte McKinney, 63 S.W.2d 697. Because of the condition of the record in this case, this court has no choice other than to order a dismissal of the appeal for want of a sufficient transcript. The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON RELATOR'S MOTION TO PERFECT TRANSCRIPT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Shaffer, 92 S.W.2d 250, 130 Tex. Crim. 81, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 101 (Tex. 1936).

92 S.W.2d 250 (Ex Parte Shaffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1942
Ex Parte Bills
111 S.W.2d 269 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Ex Parte Swindle
111 S.W.2d 271 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Ex Parte Jones
111 S.W.2d 267 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)