Ex Parte Cooper

388 S.W.2d 939
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 14, 1965
DocketMo. 38230
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 388 S.W.2d 939 (Ex Parte Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Cooper, 388 S.W.2d 939 (Tex. 1965).

Opinions

MORRISON, Judge.

In his writ of habeas corpus petitioner attacks the five year sentence he is presently serving which was pronounced against him in Cause No. 7087, in the 43rd Judicial District Court of Wise County, Texas, on the grounds that he was denied the ten days allowed for appointed counsel to prepare for trial under Article 494 Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The facts are undisputed.

The Judge of the trial court, in a certificate signed by him and attached to petitioner’s writ, certified that on the same day that attorney Sewell was appointed by the court to represent defendant Cooper, the defendant entered a plea of guilty in Cause No. 7087, and the court proceeded to hear and decide the same. He further stated that neither attorney Sewell nor defendant Cooper executed a written waiver of the ten days allowed court appointed counsel to prepare for trial, but did state that a verbal waiver was made in open court.

Article 494, supra, which provides for the appointment of counsel, reads in part as follows:

“The counsel so appointed shall have ten (10) days to prepare for trial, unless such time be waived in writing by said attorneys and the accused.” (Emphasis added.)

The provisions of Article 494, supra, are mandatory, and a verbal waiver does not comply with the provisions of the statute and is insufficient to waive the ten days time allowed appointed counsel to prepare for trial. Bennett v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 382 S.W.2d 930, and Ex Parte Gudel, Tex.Cr.App., 368 S.W.2d 775.

Under these facts, the conviction cannot stand, and the writ is granted and it is ordered that the petitioner be released from his present custody and that he be delivered to the custody of the Sheriff of Wise County, Texas, to stand trial on the original indictment in Cause No. 7087.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marin v. State
801 S.W.2d 944 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Sutton v. State
519 S.W.2d 422 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Ex Parte Taylor
522 S.W.2d 479 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Jacobs v. State
500 S.W.2d 521 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Whittington v. Gaither
272 F. Supp. 507 (N.D. Texas, 1967)
Ex parte Reece
417 S.W.2d 587 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Ex Parte Meadows
418 S.W.2d 666 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Ex Parte Austin
410 S.W.2d 439 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Ex Parte Brown
404 S.W.2d 590 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Cook v. State
404 S.W.2d 594 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Hill v. State
393 S.W.2d 901 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Ex Parte Cooper
388 S.W.2d 939 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 S.W.2d 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-cooper-texcrimapp-1965.