Ex Parte Gudel

368 S.W.2d 775, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 943
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 12, 1963
Docket35974
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 368 S.W.2d 775 (Ex Parte Gudel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Gudel, 368 S.W.2d 775, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 943 (Tex. 1963).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is a prison drawn petition for habe-as corpus.

The petitioner attacks the 12 year sentence he is serving which was pronounced against him in Cause No. 8045 in the 99th Judicial District Court of Lubbock County.

The facts are undisputed.

On October 23, 1961, upon his application showing that he was a pauper, the trial court appointed Robert E. Baber, a practicing attorney, to defend Chester Victor Gudel who was charged by indictment in said Cause No. 8045 with burglary.

Neither attorney Baber nor Gudel, the defendant in said cause, waived the 10 days allowed court appointed counsel to prepare for trial.

On October 31, 1961, the case was called for trial; the defendant’s motion for continuance was overruled and the trial proceeded, resulting in a conviction with punishment, enhanced under Art. 62 Vernon’s Ann.P.C. by reason of a prior conviction for a like offense, of 12 years.

Art. 494 Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. is mandatory. As amended in 1959 it provides:

“Whenever it is made known to the court at an arraignment or any other time that an accused charged with a felony is too poor to employ a coun *776 sel, the court shall appoint one (1) or more practicing attorneys to defend him.
“The counsel so appointed shall have ten (10) days to prepare for trial, unless such time be waived in writing by said attorneys and the accused.”

Denial of the 10 days allowed court appointed counsel to prepare for trial violated the statute and infringed the rights of the accused, the petitioner herein, to the assistance of counsel for his defense under the 6th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Under the record, the conviction cannot stand.

The writ is granted and it is ordered that the petitioner be delivered to the Sheriff of Lubbock County to answer the indictment in said Cause No. 8045 in the 99th Judicial District Court of said County as though the case had not been tried.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph Lee Taylor v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Moreno v. State
659 S.W.2d 395 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Carter v. State
480 S.W.2d 735 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Hill v. State
480 S.W.2d 200 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Henry v. State
433 S.W.2d 430 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Steward v. State
422 S.W.2d 733 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Farmer v. State
419 S.W.2d 382 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Ex Parte Meadows
418 S.W.2d 666 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Ex Parte Dowden
408 S.W.2d 512 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Johnson v. State
397 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Wilson v. State
398 S.W.2d 291 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Ex Parte Cooper
388 S.W.2d 939 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Bennett v. State
382 S.W.2d 930 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 S.W.2d 775, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-gudel-texcrimapp-1963.