Ex Parte Bailey

626 S.W.2d 741, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1194
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 21, 1981
Docket68232
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 626 S.W.2d 741 (Ex Parte Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Bailey, 626 S.W.2d 741, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1194 (Tex. 1981).

Opinions

[742]*742OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

The judge of the convicting court has made the following findings of fact on the applicant’s petition for habeas corpus relief from a felony conviction (V.A.C.C.P. Article 11.07, Sections 2-5):

“1. Petitioner was indicted on March 7, 1974 for Capital Murder under Section 19.03, Texas Penal Code, said offense allegedly having occurred on or about February 22, 1974;
“2. Petitioner was tried before a jury and convicted [sic] of Capital Murder on May 3, 1974;
“3. After the verdict, Petitioner’s attorneys withdrew their request to go to the jury for punishment on the agreement of the State and on the Court’s guarantee to assess life imprisonment.”

The convicting court also has sent us the judgment, the sentence, and the docket sheets from which we learn that the trial court dismissed the jury and assessed life imprisonment as punishment on May 3, 1974. We also glean the facts that the applicant had pleaded not guilty and that he did not perfect an appeal from his conviction. (The petition also alleges that he did not appeal.)

A defendant cannot waive trial by jury in a capital felony case. V.A.C.C.P. Article 1.14. Habeas corpus relief will be granted when a defendant has been convicted of a capital felony without the verdict of a jury. Ex parte Jackson, 606 S.W.2d 934 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Ex parte Dowden, 580 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). The verdict is not complete until the jury has rendered a completed verdict on punishment. Eads v. State, 598 S.W.2d 304 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). Therefore habeas corpus relief will be granted in this case.

The applicant’s conviction in cause 4698 in the 9th Judicial District Court of Waller County is set aside. The applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Waller County to answer the indictment pending in that cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Douthit
232 S.W.3d 69 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Douthit, Ex Parte Shannon Mark
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007
Rodriguez v. State
103 S.W.3d 460 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Powell v. State
897 S.W.2d 307 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Chaouachi v. State
870 S.W.2d 88 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Townsend v. State
846 S.W.2d 386 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Ex Parte Sorola v. State
769 S.W.2d 920 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Castillo v. State
739 S.W.2d 280 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Hernandez v. State
726 S.W.2d 53 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Sorola v. State
693 S.W.2d 417 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Ex Parte McKinney
688 S.W.2d 559 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
State Ex Rel. Turner v. McDonald
676 S.W.2d 371 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Sorola v. State
674 S.W.2d 809 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Hicks v. State
664 S.W.2d 329 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Harris v. State
645 S.W.2d 447 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ex Parte Bailey
626 S.W.2d 741 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 S.W.2d 741, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-bailey-texcrimapp-1981.