Ewing v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ewing v. State

252 S.W.3d 223, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 630, 2008 WL 1958921

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 6, 2008

DocketED 90286

StatusPublished

This text of 252 S.W.3d 223 (Ewing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ewing v. State, 252 S.W.3d 223, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 630, 2008 WL 1958921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*224 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jermaine Ewing (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. This Court affirmed Movant’s convictions, following a jury trial, for assault in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.050, RSMo 2000, 1 and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, in Movant’s direct appeal. State v. Ewing, 175 S.W.3d 207 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI