Ewing v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ewing v. State

202 S.W.3d 713, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1378, 2006 WL 2671380

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 2006·No. ED 87273·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Thomas Willie Ewing, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

*714 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Thomas Willie Ewing, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

*714 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Ewing v. State, 202 S.W.3d 713, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1378, 2006 WL 2671380 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

202 S.W.3d 713 (Ewing v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.