State v. Ewing

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ewing

155 S.W.3d 789, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2005 WL 89293

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 18, 2005

DocketNo. ED 83119

StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.W.3d 789 (State v. Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ewing, 155 S.W.3d 789, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2005 WL 89293 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Thomas W. Ewing, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000), one count of kidnapping, in violation of section 565.110 RSMo (2000), one count of burglary in the first degree, in violation of section 569.160 RSMo (2000), and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced him to thirty years imprisonment on each count, the terms to be served concurrently with each other, but consecutively to a sentence imposed in a separate case.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Thomas W. Ewing, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000), one count of kidnapping, in violation of section 565.110 RSMo (2000), one count of burglary in the first degree, in violation of section 569.160 RSMo (2000), and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced him to thirty years imprisonment on each count, the terms to be served concurrently with each other, but consecutively to a sentence imposed in a separate case.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.W.3d 789, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 80, 2005 WL 89293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ewing-moctapp-2005.