State v. Ewing

175 S.W.3d 207, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615, 2005 WL 2851546
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2005·No. ED 85273·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Jermaine Ewing appeals his conviction for assault in the first degree in violation of section 565.050 RSMo. (2000) 1 and for armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015. In two points on appeal, the defendant alleges improper strikes of four African-American venire-person in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo.2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ewing, 175 S.W.3d 207, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615, 2005 WL 2851546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

175 S.W.3d 207 (State v. Ewing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ewing v. State
252 S.W.3d 223 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)