Everett v. State

161 So. 2d 714
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 1964
Docket63-786
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 161 So. 2d 714 (Everett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Everett v. State, 161 So. 2d 714 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

161 So.2d 714 (1964)

Willie EVERETT, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 63-786.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 17, 1964.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and W. Eugene Neill, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

James W. Kynes, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Victor V. Andreevsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and HORTON and TILLMAN PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order denying the appellant's motion to vacate or set aside a judgment and sentence pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

The appellant's petition in the trial court alleged that he was "without proper counsel * * * at his trial * * *." The appellant was tried, convicted and sentenced in 1936.

We are unaware of any constitutional basis upon which an inquiry could be made into the competency of counsel employed by non-indigent defendants convicted of crimes, nor do we understand that it is one of the functions of Rule 1 to try the competency of such counsel. The record before us demonstrates that the appellant was represented at every phase of his prosecution by counsel of his own choice, from arraignment to sentence. The order appealed is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vagner v. Wainwright
398 So. 2d 448 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Edwards v. State
393 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Garmise
382 So. 2d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Brenner v. State
366 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Harden v. State
352 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Suarez v. State
338 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Staples v. State
298 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Dillingham v. State
293 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
McNamara v. State
284 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
State v. Pinto
273 So. 2d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Palladino v. State
267 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Crawley v. State
256 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Jenkins v. State
247 So. 2d 487 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Humphries v. State
232 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Belsky v. State
231 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Byrd v. State
220 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Frizzell v. State
213 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Jernigan v. State
214 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
McDaniel v. State
213 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 So. 2d 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/everett-v-state-fladistctapp-1964.