Dillingham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dillingham v. State

291 So. 2d 128

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1974

DocketNo. 73-952

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 So. 2d 128 (Dillingham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dillingham v. State, 291 So. 2d 128 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument; on the basis thereof we are of the view that the contentions of the petitioner-appellant, including his challenge to the jurisdiction of the court, are without merit. Therefore, finding no reversible error the decision of the trial court is affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

ORDER

Ordered sua sponte, Case No. 73-1039 is consolidated with 73-952 and upon said consolidation said Case No. 73-1039, commenced by the filing of a Notice of Appeal May 4, 1973 in Case No. 73-1635 CF (Mounts) in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, is hereby dismissed because the said Notice of Appeal being a duplicate of that Notice of Appeal filed in Case No. 73-952, was mistakenly filed in this court, and further,

Ordered that the appellant’s February 22, 1974 Petition for Rehearing in Case No. 73-952 is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument; on the basis thereof we are of the view that the contentions of the petitioner-appellant, including his challenge to the jurisdiction of the court, are without merit. Therefore, finding no reversible error the decision of the trial court is affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

ORDER

Ordered sua sponte, Case No. 73-1039 is consolidated with 73-952 and upon said consolidation said Case No. 73-1039, commenced by the filing of a Notice of Appeal May 4, 1973 in Case No. 73-1635 CF (Mounts) in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, is hereby dismissed because the said Notice of Appeal being a duplicate of that Notice of Appeal filed in Case No. 73-952, was mistakenly filed in this court, and further,

Ordered that the appellant’s February 22, 1974 Petition for Rehearing in Case No. 73-952 is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 So. 2d 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dillingham-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack