Harden v. State

352 So. 2d 576, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22580
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 1977·No. No. GG-18·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Royster v. State, 164 So.2d 26 (Fla. 3 DCA 1964); Simpson v. State, 164 So.2d 224 (Fla. 3 DCA 1964); Everett v. State, 161 So.2d 714 (Fla 3 DCA 1964); Crespo v. State, 339 So.2d 697 (Fla 3 DCA 1976); Cappetta v. Wainwright, 203 So.2d 609 (Fla.1967); Belsky v. State, 231 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3 DCA 1970); Brown v. State, 223 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3 DCA 1969); and Ford v. State, 210 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2 DCA 1968).

McCORD, C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harden v. State, 352 So. 2d 576, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

352 So. 2d 576 (Harden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capo v. State
363 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Brown v. Superior Pontiac-GMC, Inc.
352 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)