Evans v. State
This text of 155 So. 3d 1255 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In light of the circuit court’s recent issuance of an order directing the state attorney to file a further response to petitioner’s pending motion for postconviction relief, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the authority of Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We nonetheless urge the lower tribunal to exercise appropriate diligence in ensuring that petitioner’s pending motion is disposed of as soon as circumstances permit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 So. 3d 1255, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1288, 2015 WL 403937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.