Evans v. State
Opinions
William A. Evans challenges his involuntary civil commitment under the Involuntary Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act, sections 394.910-.932, Florida Statutes (2006), commonly known as the “Jimmy Ryce Act” (hereinafter referred to as the “Ryce Act” or the “Act”). He argues that Larimore v. State, 2 So.3d 101 (Fla.2008), requires reversal of his judgment of commitment because he was not in “lawful custody” when the civil commitment process was initiated against him. Because the facts of this case are analytically indistinguishable from In re Commitment of Phillips, 69 So.3d 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), approved, 74 So.3d 1084 (Fla.2011), we agree that a reversal is required.1 Because the Florida Supreme Court has not yet issued a full opinion in Phillips addressing the certified question in that case, we also certify the following similar question to the Court as one of great public importance:
DOES THE- STATE HAVE JURISDICTION TO INITIATE CIVIL COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE INVOLUNTARY CIVIL COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS ACT AGAINST AN INMATE WHO IS ENTITLED TO IMMEDIATE RELEASE BASED ON A CORRECTED AWARD OF TIME SERVED?2
REVERSED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
125 So. 3d 799 (Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.