Eubank v. Mayor of Eastman
This text of 48 S.E. 426 (Eubank v. Mayor of Eastman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affidavits submitted on the hearing should be incorporated in the bill of exceptions to review a refusal of an interlocutory injunction, or be a,ttac'le<3- - as exhibits thereto, duly and properly identified, or be embodied in an approved brief of evidence and brought up as a part of the record. Where neither of these methods is adopted, but copies of'the affidavits are sent up as part of the record, for the reason that the trial judge, subsequently to the certification and filing of the bill of exceptions, identified tbe originals as having been .submitted on the hearing, such affidavits have not been brought to this court in the manner prescribed by law, and therefore they can not be considered. As the question made by the assignment of error necessarily involves a consideration of the evidence, no adjudication thereon can be had, and the writ of error must be dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.E. 426, 120 Ga. 1048, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eubank-v-mayor-of-eastman-ga-1904.