Doctor Shoop's Laboratories v. Davis
This text of 94 S.E. 822 (Doctor Shoop's Laboratories v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Documents introduced in evidence on the hearing before the trial judge must be incorporated in the bill of exceptions seeking to review his judgment, or attached thereto as exhibits, duly and properly identified, or be embraced in án approved brief of evidence and brought up as record. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6140, 6141; Anderson v. Anderson, 124 Ga. 147 (52 S. E. 161); Sayer v. Brown, 119 Ga. 539 (46 S. E. 649); Griffis v. Baxter, 119 Ga. 612 (46 S. E. 840); Eubank v. Eastman, 120 Ga. 1048 (48 S. E. 426).
2. “Where there is no brief of evidence at all, and documentary evidence is merely referred to in the bill of exceptions, this court can consider the same only so far as the contents of the documents are disclosed by the recitals in the bill of exceptions.” Hancock v. McNatt, 116 Ga. 297 (42 S. E. 525), and eases there cited.
3. The bill of exceptions in this case does not sufficiently show the character of the documentary evidence introduced on the trial below to enable this court to determine whether or not the judgment excepted to was erroneous.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E. 822, 21 Ga. App. 623, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doctor-shoops-laboratories-v-davis-gactapp-1918.